Loading
alternative text
The mission of the Roseman University of Health Sciences MBA program contributes to our Student Learning Outcome goals, which are to prepare students to become:
  • Competent Business Professionals
  • Responsible Leaders
  • Entrepreneurial Managers
  • Effective Communicators

To measure student achievement (which in turn is used to initiate and implement programmatic changes), the program uses direct and indirect measures. The direct measures are an End-of-Program Comprehensive Summative Assessment and the Educational Testing Service (ETS) Major Field Test (MFT). The indirect measures are the Alumni Survey, written business plan and the oral presentation of the business plan. 

The 2006-2009 ETS Major Field Test (MFT) results are as shown below. The MFT results of  Roseman MBA Program students show improvement over time and show that the program goals were exceeded due to the effective use of the direct and indirect measures to initiate and implement curricula changes. For example, the 2006/07 MFT results lead to the implementation of some curricular changes and emphasis, and an End-of-Program Comprehensive Summative Assessment. These changes and other improvements contributed to the overall improvement of students' MFT performance and other measured outcomes.















Currently, based on the IACBE site visit team's recommendation in 2009, the Roseman MBA program has instituted the use of a business simulation capstone instead of the Major Field Test.

A recent survey (2010) distributed to Roseman MBA Program alumni asked the graduates to rate the success of the MBA Program in different areas. The rating scale was from 1 to 5, 1 being very unsuccessful and 5 being very successful. The survey results are summarized below:

Reflecting on your Roseman MBA experience please rate your level of satisfaction with the following:


Average Rating

Class Size of MBA Courses

4.50

Challenging Courses

4.17

Variety of MBA Courses

4.17

Overall quality of instruction

4.00

Hands-on Learning

4.33

Quality of Faculty

4.50

Quality of MBA program

3.83

Preparation for further academic study

4.00

Concern for me as an individual

4.00

Dedicated, caring faculty and staff

4.50

Friendships made

4.33

Preparation for a job

4.17

Prepared me for life after college

3.67

Sense of community

3.67


How successful do you feel that your specific program was in preparing you to be:


Average Rating

Competent Business Professional

4.83

Responsible Leader

4.50

Entrepreneurial Manager

4.50

Effective Communicator

4.50

 




MBA Program Strategic Objectives/Status (2009/2010)


Objective

Status

  1. Continuously Improve Student Learning Outcomes
  1. Exceeded National Average on MFT and instituted simulations capstone.
  2. Business Plan project, Analysis, Written and Oral Communications Scores improved significantly; scores > 90% level overall.
  3. Ortho/MBA and PharmD/MBA Joint Programs are improving in their dental/pharmacy emphasis, using Harvard Business School Cases and other supplementary materials.
  1. Recruiting continue to increase enrollment
  1. PharmD/MBA enrollment has continued to grow (2008 – 2011).
  2. MBA program for PharmD students in Utah  has increased enrollment, and the first set of graduates is due in June 2012.
  3. First cohort of students from a corporate employer (St. Rose) started classes (June 2011). 
  4. More attempts to recruit corporate sponsored students.
  5. Raised minimum admissions standards and implemented a better quantitative/qualitative admissions decision criteria
  1. Increase Faculty Academic & Professional Credentials
  1. Now more than 95% of adjunct faculty are doctoral qualified
  2. JD/MBA adjunct faculty has increased
  3. All full-time faculty are doctoral qualified
  4. Full-time faculty research output continues to increase
  1. Achieve Business Program Accreditation by 2010
  1. Achieved IACBE accreditation for MBA program (2010-2016)